Simply Google design or marketing blog, and you'll find TONS of relevant links... but how many are actually good sources?
I remember having to do school projects, and there were only certain sites that were considered "real" sources to cite for projects. With Wikipedia and other user-generated content this old way of learning who to trust has been thrown out of the window.
After 'stumbling' a couple pages today I came to Debra Unplugged. Now, I'm sure the blog has some great nuggets of advice in the vault of posts. And, probably gets over twice (if not more) the unique visits as this blog... but I was shocked at the post that everyone had Stumbled.
In the post, the author literally stumbles through product branding, naming conventions, graphic representation, color theory, and then finishes off by telling me that a good logo can be had for only $150-250.
Since the preface for this blog is "Unplugged on Information Marketing," I'm guessing the audience are not designers... therefore each one of these topics deserves at least it's own post. That being said, I hope the readers don't take her advice (this time). Instead, they should just go hire a designer locally and go through the entire process nice and slow. It'll cost more than $250, but they'll get a MUCH more effective logo.
Coming back to the preface of the blog, and the point of this post, the web has made it incredibly easy to share advice. This is proves to be a catch 22, and somehow reminds me of the infamous quote from Spiderman:
"...with great power, comes great responsibility."
By participating in social media through blogging or twittering or whatever, we've been given our proverbial podium to broadcast our thoughts and ideas. Because of this, we need to understand that the advice we give must be valid, as true as possible, and lastly relevant.
In this blog's case I think the author just missed the last point and reached past her comfort zone into design. Business' can fall into the same tempting trap with brand extensions. Starbucks for one is in the middle of a huge revision to more accurately reflect their original purpose: selling coffee.
They're doing this by setting criteria with which to hold to current and future product offerings. This is a great example of the right thing to do, and might be helpful for your business. Get some perspective on your offerings and toss out the ones that aren't relevant. I know I won't miss the stuffed Barista bears at Starbucks, and your customers probably won't miss your non-relevant offerings either. -Reed
Recent Comments